We don't need no stinking ballots
From http://wedonotconsent.blogspot.com/2006/08/san-diego-election-challenge-goes-to.html :
"The motions to dismiss are based on the argument of Rep. Bilbray and Registrar Haas that the Court has no jurisdiction on account of Art. I, sec. 5 of the United States constitution, which provides that the House and Senate are to judge the qualifications of their members, and further arguing that the House's authority to do so is exclusive, thus depriving the California courts of any jurisdiction."
So they're saying that the House and Senate don't need election results to decide who's a member? This has got to be the most blatant demonstration yet that we are not living in a democracy any more.
Lawsuits my shiny metal @$$, this is time to march in the streets and demand our country back.
"The motions to dismiss are based on the argument of Rep. Bilbray and Registrar Haas that the Court has no jurisdiction on account of Art. I, sec. 5 of the United States constitution, which provides that the House and Senate are to judge the qualifications of their members, and further arguing that the House's authority to do so is exclusive, thus depriving the California courts of any jurisdiction."
So they're saying that the House and Senate don't need election results to decide who's a member? This has got to be the most blatant demonstration yet that we are not living in a democracy any more.
Lawsuits my shiny metal @$$, this is time to march in the streets and demand our country back.
posted by Kathryn at 3:14 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home